merlin
You chose a custom title
... and that fund is not used exclusively for providing a state pension, but can also be used for a variety of "other" uses!That is how it came across.
In the UK nobody has a state pension 'account'....as you are aware (having spent 38 years doing public service work) all the money goes into a central fund.
Other funds also exist for more general public spending.
Wikipedia has a reasonable description of the fund and of its historic (and growing!) surpluses over expenditure ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Insurance_Fund )
Its final paragraph makes interesting reading in the light of criticism that our state pensions fall far below the levels paid elsewhere in Europe, that there is an imbalance between the payments made to British residents, between those recent arrivals in Britain compared with those who paid N.I. and other taxes throughout their working lives, and those of us who are still prejudiced against by our pensions being frozen.
It reads: "Levels of benefit and contributions are set following the advice of the Government Actuary, who recommends that a prudential balance of two months contribution revenue (about £8 billion) should be kept in the fund."
Now check the current surplus in the fund...
Finally, it seems that the Government is only willing to change the way it operates when that is to its own financial advantage - and not to the advantage of the people it should represent. A fine, pension-related, example is when the rule of pension funds growing free of tax on them was changed so that they had tax deducted from that growth thereafter. That remains a concealed tax. The pension's owner doesn't pay the tax directly, but the fund has tax deducted nevertheless. This change was made during the 1990s and made quite a difference to the performance of the funds. Today, it is very difficult to find any reference to the change ever having been made!